What do you mean by "good"? A full-fledged office suite, e.g. Open or MS? Auto-completion when typing in names of articles in your wiki, or templates?
As far as I can tell, Media Wiki was designed for relatively simple formatting. I admit I write in wiki-text, though I now tend to switch to FCKeditor (Version 1.0.1) to edit tables. It does a pretty good job, and allows you to go back & forth between wiki text & "rich editor" modes. * * ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Haim (Howard) Roman Computer Center, Jerusalem College of Technology Phone: 052-8-592-599 (6022 from within Machon Lev) On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 18:05, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote: > I have a requirement for an intranet wiki for sales, marketing and > other people who have no technical abilities whatsoever. > > I'd like to use MediaWiki. This requires WYSIWYG. > > There is no good WYSIWYG for MediaWiki - but what are the least-worst > solutions others have managed with this requirement, using extensions > I can download? (e.g. your personal hacked-up CKeditor is a good > answer if you have your patch set publicly available.) > > (MW 1.16, by the way, is ridiculously easy to install, notably more so > than previous versions. From being asked "could we have a wiki for > this?" to installed with happy users with ImageMagick, rsvg and > Extension:InputBox was under an hour. I'm really looking forward to > 1.17.) > > > - d. > > _______________________________________________ > MediaWiki-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l > _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
