(to list as well)
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Gerard <[email protected]> Date: 10 February 2011 16:58 Subject: Re: [Mediawiki-l] Least-worst present WYSIWYG solution? To: "Haim (Howard) Roman" <[email protected]> On 10 February 2011 16:46, Haim (Howard) Roman <[email protected]> wrote: > What do you mean by "good"? A full-fledged office suite, e.g. Open or MS? > Auto-completion when typing in names of articles in your wiki, or > templates? Just the editing window itself, so they never need to see wikitext. > As far as I can tell, Media Wiki was designed for relatively simple > formatting. I admit I write in wiki-text, though I now tend to switch to > FCKeditor (Version 1.0.1) to edit tables. It does a pretty good job, and > allows you to go back & forth between wiki text & "rich editor" modes. I shall give that a non-techie testing then! - d. _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
