Hi, Am Dienstag 28 Juni 2011 schrieb Ville M. Vainio: > Well, it has a much better framerate and touch response than what you > get by doing the same with QWidgets. Or are you complaining about QML > allowing you to use ugly icons (from Tango) and do bad color design? Most hobbyists aren't artists and nor have the money to pay one. Either the widget set forces me to comply to certain style guides (made by/with artits) or the result may be as ugly as qmlreddit.
> Isn't that a good thing? QML gives you power, it's up to you to use > that well. For direct comparison with QWidgets, you need to compare > against QML + Qt Quick Components on the given platform. In many cases i don't want that power. I don't want to code every widget myself. Often i just want to focus on functionality, not on eye candy. It's great that qml allows people to focus on eye candy, but there are also many valid reasons not to want to do everything yourself. People like the author of qmlreddit amd me obviously have a use for the skills of the widget designer. Let me say it one more (last) time: I don't want to tell you that qml is bad or useless or whatever. I just want to tell you that there's still reason and demand for this 1984 technology as Kate called it. Believe me or not: I am such a person. I have a need for a rich widget set that allows me to choose from a big established set of UI elements rather then re-design everything from scratch. Qml is nice, but that doesn't mean qwidgets are useless. They are just different things and there's a use case for both of them. Till _______________________________________________ MeeGo-community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-community http://wiki.meego.com/Mailing_list_guidelines
