Hello,
according to every review, the N900 browser is the best browser in the mobile 
market.
So, I don't understand. Where is your frustration coming from?

The way you wrote the mail, and the tone used, it seems you are the only 
religious person here.

Here some comparisons using real web pages.
Android browser running on a 1GHz CPU
and N900 browser running on 600MHz CPU + full Flash support.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6heC2anIxY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYlNcnkuA4Q


Anyway, MeeGo will be an open platform, everyone will be free to use what 
wanted.
Again, where is the problem?

But is intolerable, as you introduce yourself as former Nokia, that you give to 
open community misleading information about Nokia employees.


Alessandro Cogliati




________________________________
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of ext George Matveev
Sent: 24 March, 2010 16:47
To: Clint Christopher Cañada
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [MeeGo-dev] browser engine and other big architectural decisions

Hi,

this browser *engine* question was already touched upon many times
here and it is certainly puzzling and deserves attention of those who are
responsible for (architectural) decision making in this project
(hopefully Intel team is reading this).

My *personal* impression (as someone who was directly involved in
selection/customization/porting of browser engine in the past and also as 
former Nokian) is that Maemo (i.e. Nokia)
browser team is build almost entirely of (russian speaking) people who 
*believe* that Mozilla/Gecko is the way to go and they do not care
much about Acid3 test (100/100 achieved by WebKit and Opera on the same day - 
26March2008, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid3) or SunSpider tests (with 
screenshots forwarded to them) or other "signs"
(Epiphany switched to WebKit, most successful devices like iPhone and Android 
use WebKit, etc, etc).

Religious people are difficult to talk to, especially if they have no previous
exposure to other philosophical systems (no smiles here).

The end result - very poor browser performance on all Tablets
(Loading objects, Loading objects, with complete freeze of UI),
frustrated customers and ultimately the failure of the platform
(since for most users browser is most popular application).

To become a success a mobile stack needs to select best open source
components and integrate them seamlessly and effectively on best
platform (i.e. Debian) . LiMo is already doing this.

Best regards,
George Matveev


--- On Tue, 3/23/10, Clint Christopher Cañada <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Clint Christopher Cañada <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] The nativer rendering model proposal in Fennec
To: [email protected]
Date: Tuesday, March 23, 2010, 10:23 PM

Hello,

Doesn't Qt's web component use webkit integration?  Why doesn't Meego use that 
one, since the Meego UI Toolkit would be based on Qt as stated in the 
architecture layout?  Nokia uses webkit on their symbian smartphones as well, 
so I do think that webkit would be a logical choice for a primary native 
browser - it would make Meego consistent throughout all platforms.  Again, 
these are my thoughts on the matter.

I do not mind though having a second browser as a choice.

On 3/24/2010 1:56 AM, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 3/23/2010 10:41, Jeremiah Foster wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 23, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/22/2010 22:53, Wu, Yong wrote:
>>>> Background:
>>>> Fennec uses a different rendering model as Firefox,
>>>
>>> I would be seriously concerned about using either Firefox or Fennec on a 
>>> mobile device.
>>
>> Fennec (or really Firefox Mobile) is popular, fast, and innovative. It is 
>> already available for the N900 which is a MeeGo platform. I don't share your 
>> concerns but I also don't think having to html rendering engines in MeeGo is 
>> necessary.
>>
>
> yeah and if I'd have to pick one right now I'd pick webkit to be honest...
> _______________________________________________
> MeeGo-dev mailing list
> [email protected]</mc/[email protected]>
> http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev

_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]</mc/[email protected]>
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev


_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev

Reply via email to