Well, I think that W3C is more than HTML5, at least the Device APIs
Working Group is more focused on device and APIs, not in HTML5

2010/4/19 Rogers, Rick <[email protected]>:
> HTML5 = W3C in this context
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Jose Manrique Lopez de la Fuente
> Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 2:06 PM
> To: meego-dev
> Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] OMTP Bondi - any plans yet?
>
> Hello,
>
> Nobody has W3C into account? (even when they are getting input from Nokia, 
> BONDI, operators, browser developers,...)
>
> http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/
>
> That's the way!
>
> 2010/4/18 Nils Faerber <[email protected]>:
>> Rogers, Rick schrieb:
>>> Nils,
>> Hi Rick!
>>
>>> BONDI, JIL and WAC (add
>>> http://www.wholesaleappcommunity.com/docs/whitepaper.pdf to your
>>> list)
>>
>> Ah, didn't know JIl and WAC yet, thanks ;)
>>
>>> all converge around web applications written to HTML5, with
>>> extensions to support handset features that are beyond HTML5. I don't
>>> know of anyone working on BONDI for MeeGo, but would be very
>>> interested in learning anything you come across. I think you're
>>> right, it wouldn't be that hard - maybe WAC is the place to focus
>>> moving forward?  I know the
>>
>> I had a brief look at all three again, I started with WAC and stumbled
>> accross an issue - I think... the governance. So I checked that again
>> with all three.
>>
>> What I do not like about WAC is that it is 100% operator focussed and
>> the name of the project makes IMHO their intention pretty clear
>> "Wholesale Application" - they are only interested in creating a broad
>> application market.
>>
>> While this is of course one of the valid goals it should not be the
>> only one. As a developer I miss the "level of invention" here. The
>> governance of WAC though suggests that selling applications is *the*
>> driving factor for the project and to the few major players in it:
>> There are a few core operators that build the board of directors and
>> new (operator) members can only get a non-voting visitor seat in the
>> board. No mention of other possibly parties (like vendors or makers)
>> and especially not mention of third party developers e.g. from the open 
>> source.
>>
>> This sounds pretty limited - sounds like a pretty narrow minded club
>> to me so I would personally not like to pursue that road. Also from
>> technology standpoint it seems to me that they are only up to taking
>> up existing bits and specify a (sub-)set they want to support in WAC.
>> It does not seem that they want to actually do much own development.
>>
>> JIL is similar, only members are China Mobile, SoftBank Mobile,
>> Verizon Wireless, and Vodafone, 100% operator driven again. But they
>> are up to do own development and want to provide an SDK - well...
>>
>> In contrast to those two OMTP is a quite larger organisation, current
>> OMTP members:
>> http://www.omtp.org/Membership.aspx
>> and Bondi seems to be pretty open, it is Apache licensed and announced
>> as an open source project which at least suggests that open source
>> developers can take some part in it.
>>
>> I should probably note that I am not affiliated with OMTP nor Bondi ;)
>>
>>> folks at Aplix and ACCESS were involved with the OMTP reference
>>> implementation of BONDI.
>>
>> Yes, since they are LiMo foundation members (as is Wind River) and
>> LiMo seems to go away from native applications towards Web2.0 someone
>> had to do the job ;)
>>
>>> Rick Rogers
>>> Wind River
>> Cheers
>>  nils
>>
>> --
>> kernel concepts GbR      Tel: +49-271-771091-12 Sieghuetter Hauptweg
>> 48  Fax: +49-271-771091-19
>> D-57072 Siegen           Mob: +49-176-21024535
>> http://www.kernelconcepts.de
>> _______________________________________________
>> MeeGo-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> J. Manrique López de la Fuente
> http://www.jsmanrique.es
> _______________________________________________
> MeeGo-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
>



-- 
J. Manrique López de la Fuente
http://www.jsmanrique.es
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev

Reply via email to