On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Robinson Tryon <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I'm saying that Intel is currently the owner of the MeeGo kernel >> package, and that if you create a bug in the meego bugzilla against the >> kernel package, it gets automatically assigned to an Intel developer. > ... >> Hopefully in the future there is a way to handle assigning arm-specific >> kernel bugs to a Nokia person, but I don't see that happening at the >> moment, do you? > > Is it the intention of MeeGo to have ownership of packages such as the > kernel tied to a particular company or external entity?
I strongly hope there has just been a lot of confusion and muddied waters in this thread. This should be a fairly straightforward issue - I'm not sure why it's gone so far out of proportion. > It seems like it might be much more fruitful to have ownership of > MeeGo packages restricted to individuals or to Meego-defined groups of > individuals. This is already the case. There is already a kernel team set up: http://gitorious.org/+meego-kernel-developers > --R Best Regards, Robin Burchell mob: +447702671419 msn: [email protected] irc: w00t @ irc.freenode.net twr: http://twitter.com/w00teh lac: http://identi.ca/w00t _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
