On 04/28/10 21:39, ext Robin Burchell wrote:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Robinson Tryon
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Greg KH<[email protected]> wrote:
I'm saying that Intel is currently the owner of the MeeGo kernel
package, and that if you create a bug in the meego bugzilla against the
kernel package, it gets automatically assigned to an Intel developer.
...
Hopefully in the future there is a way to handle assigning arm-specific
kernel bugs to a Nokia person, but I don't see that happening at the
moment, do you?
Is it the intention of MeeGo to have ownership of packages such as the
kernel tied to a particular company or external entity?
I strongly hope there has just been a lot of confusion and muddied
waters in this thread. This should be a fairly straightforward issue -
I'm not sure why it's gone so far out of proportion.
It seems like it might be much more fruitful to have ownership of
MeeGo packages restricted to individuals or to Meego-defined groups of
individuals.
This is already the case. There is already a kernel team set up:
http://gitorious.org/+meego-kernel-developers
Again, this list is from Moblin and incomplete. This list should contain names
from Nokia and other agreed companies/parties.
This is just indication that we are moving forward without having all the things
setup perfectly. Quite business as usual in my mind.
-sakari
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
