On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Markus <[email protected]> wrote: > Am Freitag 28 Mai 2010, 15:49:20 schrieb Robin Burchell: > >> Certainly. QtWebkit is probably usable. But it's not a browser, it's a >> technology to create a browser. Do you have a concrete proposal? Are >> you suggesting Arora, or something else? > > Arora with GUI tweaks for netbook use.
Great. What tweaks? >> While Arora is OK for desktop usage, it might well not prove to be as >> useful in its current state on netbook (or worse still, handset > > Which is why Nokia's MeeGo Handset and Symbian teams should cooperate on a > browser. I'm afraid it usually doesn't work like that. If you want something to happen, you're going to have to put work in to make it happen. That might well mean taking Arora and studying it to see what changes are worthwhile (if you're not a C++ person) or actually working on making those changes, and (preferably) talking to the Arora people about how to push those changes back upstream. Once you start to lead the way, others will follow, if they like what you're doing. Robin Burchell mob: +447702671419 msn: [email protected] irc: w00t @ irc.freenode.net twr: http://twitter.com/w00teh lac: http://identi.ca/w00t _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
