On Fri, 28 May 2010 08:24:04 -0600, Markus <[email protected]> wrote: > Am Freitag 28 Mai 2010, 16:02:01 schrieb Roger WANG: > > > Did you see any program in the release loading QtWebKit, or you just > > post here before you actually get it running? > > Dude, seriously. I was just asking why no QtWebKit browser is used by default. > If you don't want to answer that simple question or don't know the answer, > then OK, but don't be a bitch who makes fun of people who ask very simple > questions.
I think we are mixing two questions here. First you asked why "load two web rendering engines into memory" which it turns out we are not doing (as QtWebKit is not actually in memory). Now you are asking a different question: "why no QtWebKit browser" and the answer was given repeatedly elsewhere in this thread - there simply is no production quality QtWebKit browser that is optimized for small screens. So let's calm down, stop insulting each other and consider both of your questions answered, ok? /D -- Dirk Hohndel Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
