On 2010-05-29, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > Others (myself included) argued that people (YOU) were mostly > interested in the sources and would be willing to deal with > the "wrong" domain and the hassle of the migration in a week > or two.
I think you've successfully made it clear enough that this is an early first release that could be a bit bumpy. > My argument for openness won, but frankly, I'd like to know > if we called this correctly - is it better to do "open early, > sort it out in public" or would people prefer "get it right, > on the correct domain - we'll wait for it". This way we can > learn for the next time something like this comes up. You called it corectly IHVHO. Nothing is ever finished enough to be perfect. Perhaps if it was called Meego v0.99 then it would have made it absolutely clear it was almost ready but needing some polish that can only come from a public release. --markc _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
