Dirk,

I think the right move was made here. Access to the bits ASAP is most important.

Mark said it best though,

"You called it corectly IHVHO. Nothing is ever finished enough to be perfect."

Aiming for perfection before showing people is a limit that can never
be reached. Getting the bits out there helps you reach it. The rest is
just details.

Best,
Aaron

On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Mark Constable <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2010-05-29, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>> Others (myself included) argued that people (YOU) were mostly
>> interested in the sources and would be willing to deal with
>> the "wrong" domain and the hassle of the migration in a week
>> or two.
>
> I think you've successfully made it clear enough that this is
> an early first release that could be a bit bumpy.
>
>> My argument for openness won, but frankly, I'd like to know
>> if we called this correctly - is it better to do "open early,
>> sort it out in public" or would people prefer "get it right,
>> on the correct domain - we'll wait for it". This way we can
>> learn for the next time something like this comes up.
>
> You called it corectly IHVHO. Nothing is ever finished enough
> to be perfect. Perhaps if it was called Meego v0.99 then it
> would have made it absolutely clear it was almost ready but
> needing some polish that can only come from a public release.
>
> --markc
> _______________________________________________
> MeeGo-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
>
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev

Reply via email to