On Jul 8, 2010, at 17:46, David Greaves wrote: > On 07/07/10 00:32, Dirk Hohndel wrote: >> Again, the default builds that we provide are optimized for Atom - I >> don't think there's anything wrong with that. It's fairly straight >> forward to build for other platforms if you need that, but I think it is >> not a reasonable request that we shouldn't optimize for our platform. > > I think this is one area where people really need to think carefully about > whether they have an Intel, Nokia or MeeGo hat on. The "we"s in that sentence > are a tad ambiguous. > > Clearly when *Intel* ship MeeGo-on-atom it should be polished, focused and > optimised. > > However, MeeGo makes many claims to be open and inclusive; shouldn't it seek > to minimise barriers to entry?
Furthermore, when people make the claim that it is 'cross-platform' is that a valid claim if MeeGo does not work identically well on ARM as it does on Atom? If Nokia and Intel are not responsible for the effective working of MeeGo on the ARM platform, then who is? Jeremiah _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
