On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:21:58 +0200
Yves-Alexis Perez <[email protected]> wrote:

> On jeu., 2010-07-08 at 12:37 -0400, Bernd Stramm wrote:
> > > On 08/07/2010 18:18, Bernd Stramm wrote:
> > > > Where it does come in is that private users today cannot be
> > > > reached by IPv4 unless they go through servers. This is
> > > > different with IPv6, at least at the moment. 
> > > 
> > > So what you want is something like link-local messaging at a
> > > global scale?
> > 
> > Right, I want normal global IP addresses as originally intended. The
> > NAT stuff was added later because of lack of IPv4 address space.
> 
> How exactly do you intend to “discover“ people? Multicast isn't really
> an option like link-local messaging. Some kind of peer to peer on top
> of XMPP?

Ah, that's the tricky part. 

Configuration with a known group of identities is one way, and
certainly part of the solution. 

Using out-of-band communication is another way. The
server based chat is one way of doing this, on top of the server
protocol (without the server having knowledge of it).

People who want to connect to everyone in the world can advertise their
address, and they will get what they deserve :)

And of course there is DNS. That will still work as before.

-- 
Bernd Stramm
<[email protected]>

_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev

Reply via email to