On 08/12/2010 06:42 AM, David Greaves wrote:
On 12/08/10 00:06, martin brook wrote:
Hi,
After a lively discussion on #meego
(http://mg.pov.lt/meego-irclog/%23meego.2010-08-11.log.html from 21:17)
I have created a wiki page to further community developmet of a non
SSSE3 Meego build.
http://wiki.meego.com/Devices/nonSSSE3
If you can help in any way or have any comments please add your meego
nick to the wiki with details or catch up with us in #meego
And I've been collecting comments - not all of which are mine and not all of
which stand up to scrutiny - but which I think *do* reflect a lot of opinions
and general 'buzz'.
http://mer-l-in.blogspot.com/2010/08/are-intel-subverting-meegocom.html
David,
Seeing your post is a bit disconcerting. I would completely disagree
that there are problems on non-Atom hardware. The specific problem is
that a Core 2 or newer is needed. Yes, that still does leave a lot of
older hardware out in the cold since they do not support SSE3. It does
however, include a lot of hardware that is out there. It did start
selling in July of 2006.
I understand that you say some of the points on the blog post don't
stand up to scrutiny, but it would be really helpful if you pointed out
which ones didn't.
BTW, this is being sent from a Lenovo T400 running MeeGo which
definitely doesn't use an Atom.
Ryan
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
