On 12 August 2010 19:07, Ryan Ware <[email protected]> wrote: > On 08/12/2010 06:42 AM, David Greaves wrote: >> >> On 12/08/10 00:06, martin brook wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> After a lively discussion on #meego >>> (http://mg.pov.lt/meego-irclog/%23meego.2010-08-11.log.html from 21:17) >>> I have created a wiki page to further community developmet of a non >>> SSSE3 Meego build. >>> >>> http://wiki.meego.com/Devices/nonSSSE3 >>> >>> If you can help in any way or have any comments please add your meego >>> nick to the wiki with details or catch up with us in #meego >>> >> >> And I've been collecting comments - not all of which are mine and not all >> of >> which stand up to scrutiny - but which I think *do* reflect a lot of >> opinions >> and general 'buzz'. >> >> http://mer-l-in.blogspot.com/2010/08/are-intel-subverting-meegocom.html >> >> > > David, > > Seeing your post is a bit disconcerting. I would completely disagree that > there are problems on non-Atom hardware. The specific problem is that a > Core 2 or newer is needed. Yes, that still does leave a lot of older > hardware out in the cold since they do not support SSE3. It does however, > include a lot of hardware that is out there. It did start selling in July > of 2006.
My AMD CPU is less than 12 months old but Meego does not work on it. $ cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep SSSE3 (no output) -- Alistair Buxton [email protected] _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
