On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Wichmann, Mats D <[email protected]> wrote: > [email protected] wrote: >> Is there a possibility for MeeGo adapting compliance for a different >> class/tier of vertical markets? Or is this a path that just shouldn't be >> bothered with for those of us wanting to use it (in a branded way, and >> working with the project to define compatibility) on platforms that the >> originators aren't interested in? > > It's theoretically possible, based on the claim: > > Compliance is profile based where a profile specifies a device category. > Profiles are approved by the MeeGo TSG. > > I guess it would mean convincing the Steering Group of the value... > > > (seems like this twist of the topic is more appropriate moved > to another location per Dawn's request the other day)
Ok, she also requested at the last TSG meeting to post followup compliance questions to meego-dev. I'll move to -community as the catch all. _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
