Warren Baird wrote: > Looks like a great start... > > I agree with a lot of the other comments here - especially about > splitting it up into two sections for apps and implementations. > > Lines 60-62 seem to disallow the possibility of producing apps using > byte-code compiled languages like java or C# - is that intentional?
No, indeed the fuzzy wording at the end is supposed to allow that: "or any other supported language format." (an early reviewer objected to calling out bytecode, at least partly because the languages you mention aren't in the current required stack) _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
