Hi, >-----Original Message----- >From: meego-dev-boun...@meego.com >[mailto:meego-dev-boun...@meego.com] On Behalf Of ext Patrick Ohly >Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 2:59 PM >To: Zhu, Yongsheng >Cc: Kavuri Sateesh (Nokia-MS/Bangalore); meego-dev@meego.com >Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] Trying to sync Buteo with Google > >On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 09:42 +0100, Zhu, Yongsheng wrote: >> Hi, Sateesh & Patrick >> I'm working on trying to sync Buteo with Google service via SyncML >> protocol. Currently it's blocked because Google service >sends 'unauthorized' error. See the attached syncML messages >"buteo-msgs.zip". >> Since SyncEvolution can sync with Google correctly, as a >reference, I also dump its SyncML messages. >> I'm so curious about this since two messages from Buteo and >SyncEvolution are almost same. > >Indeed, no apparent relevant difference stands out. Perhaps >there is some difference outside of the message content >itself? Do both programs use the same message encoding (should >be WBXML for SyncEvolution)? Is the HTTP POST from Buteo going >to the redirected URL?
The HTTP POST doesn't go the redirected URL AFAIK. It goes to the URL that's mentioned in the profile. >If that's all the same, then I only see one possible approach: >minimize the differences until it succeeds. > >Sateesh, you said that the Google config hasn't been included >yet because not enough testing was done. Has any testing been >done? Did you get past the authentication problem? > >-- >Best Regards, Patrick Ohly > >The content of this message is my personal opinion only and >although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here >in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I >authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. Regards, Deepak _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
