On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Auke Kok <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I also don't think there's an official stance on the amount of memory
> required to ""run MeeGo"". In general, with 512mb most devices see a lot
> better performance than with 128mb, so you can draw your conclusions on
> whether it's 'good enough' for everyone or just 'good enough' for *you*.
>
>
It has been previously stated[0] that the MeeGo compliance specs will
contain exactly that - strictly defined minimum hardware req for particular
profiles in order to call them compliant ('real', if you wish). Even the OP
formulated the question like that by saying 'minimum RAM required'. With
enough hackery, you certainly could get MeeGo (and Linux in general) to run
on very modest hardware or benefit from extra memory, but the question is
what the official number for a particular device profile is (it's a
different story that we don't have those numbers officially yet, just saying
that 'how high/low can you hack/endure it' was not really how I understood
the question).
[0] http://lists.meego.com/pipermail/meego-dev/2010-September/005963.html
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
