On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Frederic Crozat <[email protected]> wrote: > Le vendredi 15 octobre 2010 à 00:43 +0300, Felipe Contreras a écrit : > >> What I'm mostly worried is *why* people felt the need to create >> spin-offs. Maybe we should be thinking about using NetworkManager >> instead of ConnMan; shall we start a new thread about that? >> >> Other than ConnMan, is there any other reason why the MeeGo core is >> not suitable? > > Hardware support (non-SSE3, ATI, nVidia, etc) is probably number one > reason. Alternative applications would be number two. > > And there are still stuff ConnMan + its MeeGo UI are not able to handle > (WPA2 enterprise for instance..) > > And moreover, it is still much easier for "community" people to hack on > their current distribution. And last time I check, we are doing Free > Software, so people are free to do whatever they want with Free Software > code..
Certainly, I was just wondering if there's anything MeeGo could do so people didn't feel the need to fork. But there's nothing wrong which such projects, if it's easier for you, go ahead. Also, FWIW I think the name Smeegol is ok. -- Felipe Contreras _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
