On Monday, 25 de October de 2010 17:35:48 Arjan van de Ven wrote: > this is me, one of the MeeGo architects, opposing breaking the MeeGo API > this lightly. > MeeGo's value proposition is about giving a consistent platform to ISVs; > and this proposal completely destroys that > in image, if not reality. > > In part this is about reputation and part is about reality; if MeeGo > ends up breaking the ABIs all the time, or perceived as breaking ABIs > this lightly, > why bother with MeeGo at all ???? > > so yes give me a break.
This is why I was wondering why we're not using hardfp *now* for 1.1.0.
We shouldn't be breaking binary compatibility.
We shouldn't be softp either.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
