On Monday, 25 de October de 2010 17:35:48 Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> this is me, one of the MeeGo architects, opposing breaking the MeeGo API 
> this lightly.
> MeeGo's value proposition is about giving a consistent platform to ISVs; 
> and this proposal completely destroys that
> in image, if not reality.
> 
> In part this is about reputation and part is about reality; if MeeGo 
> ends up breaking the ABIs all the time, or perceived as breaking ABIs 
> this lightly,
> why bother with MeeGo at all ????
> 
> so yes give me a break.

This is why I was wondering why we're not using hardfp *now* for 1.1.0.

We shouldn't be breaking binary compatibility.

We shouldn't be softp either.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
  Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
      PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
      E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev

Reply via email to