On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 23:52 +0200, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: > This is why I was wondering why we're not using hardfp *now* for 1.1.0. > > We shouldn't be breaking binary compatibility. > > We shouldn't be softp either.
Just reminding the obvious, but as for today there is no major MeeGo products in the market, no AppUp for MeeGo, no Ovi for MeeGo, no Extras for MeeGo. Even the MeeGo SDK itself is in its first iterations. I see Arjan's point made from an architecture consistency point of view - but from a marketing point of view 1.2 and following releases will be a lot more used and scrutinized than 1.1.x releases. If this soft-hard break is unavoidable then it seems that now it will create a lot less hassle than in 6 months or later. -- Quim _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
