2010/10/25, Marius Vollmer <[email protected]>: > ext Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]> writes: > >> that's not something that's just ok to do easily or.. well really, ever. > > I don't actually see it as a transition, but as one more supported > architecture. Instead of i386 and arm, we have i386, arm-sfp, and > arm-hfp. > > Or in other words, the difficult part is not supporting hardfp, the > difficult part is dropping support for softfp. So maybe we can have > hardfp without dropping support for softfp. > > [ I have no clue whatsoever how compliant 3rd party applications are > supposed to deal with multiple architectures... Does an app need to > exist for all architectures to be compliant? > ] > _______________________________________________ > MeeGo-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev >
-- Mikael Hermansson - Software Engineer at: Sensor Communications Sweden AB Web: http://www.sensorcommunications.se Email: [email protected] Phone: +46732546542 Please don’t print this e-mail unless you really need to! _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
