Minjung, Not using the camerabin based backend is not according to the MeeGo architecture. MeeGo camera adaptation interface IS gst camerabin.
-sakari On 3/11/10 5:11 PM, "Shin Minjung (Nokia-MS-Qt/Brisbane)" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Qt Mobility camera support prefers camerabin based implementation as backend > so that we do not need to have hardware specific implementation. Intel wanted > to contribute to the camera backend but the solution was implemented as a > customized pipeline using QGstreamerCaptureService to utilize hardware > acceleration. We decided to accept the contribution. It would be better if we > have camerabin based implementation in the future. > > For more information please refer to this mail in Mobility mailing list. > http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/6jz3kNo0p2e8fZMe8fWd > > Regards, > Min > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of ext Teemu Tuominen > Sent: Thursday, 4 November 2010 12:27 AM > To: Palojarvi Jari (Nokia-MS/Tampere) > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] camera subdev solution ? > > > good point, they will surely differ. And I surely hope it stays on gst > level as you refer. > > However, Meego tends to generalize packetizing as far as possible and > also gst-plugins packaging tend to gather stuff. So, I had a feeling the > camera stuff is not an exception. > > If we consider... > > qt-mobility (camera API, multimedia/gstreamer/camerabin) > gstreamer > gst-plugins-bad-free (camerabin, libphotography) > gst-plugins-camera (generic source elements and other oss source > elements for different hw) > kernel > > And when the request comes to use specific implementation - it would > mean additional packages, not replacive. Doesn't that look good ? > > Although deve's are not having fun with this ideology in Meego, I felt > it isn't far from possible if we get humble and sync up to iterate > things for camera features. And yet, man could enable all features using > HW specific replacive solution. > > In mean time, we will likely push another specific package basing on > gst-nokia-videosrc and try to enable ways of utilizing it through higher > level API's as planned. Unfortunately from my point of view it requires > a bit of studying and takes some time. During this workout I have also > got a bit diverged input about how things are implemented within > top-level components, so its time to read the code myself. However, I'm > all ears to anyone working with the field. > > > regards, > -Teemu > > > > On 11/03/2010 02:45 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> Just a quick note highlighting the obvious: the camera source component in >> GStreamer and the subdev drivers are a part of camera HW adaptation. So they >> may (and likely will) differ between different HW platforms. >> >> Regards, Jari >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >>> On Behalf Of ext Zhang, Vivian >>> Sent: 27. lokakuuta 2010 04:25 >>> To: Teemu Tuominen; Development for the MeeGo Project >>> Cc: Hu, Gang A >>> Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] camera subdev solution ? >>> >>> Hi, >>> The source of gst-v4l2-camsrc project in OBS is located at >>> http://meego.gitorious.org/maemo-multimedia/mfldv4l2camsrc which is >>> branched from gst-nokia-videosrc. Intel engineers are working on this >>> project to do more enhancements/fixings for Intel Medfield ISP. >>> Also cc'd hu, gang for more technical details. >>> >>> Thanks >>> vivian >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >>> On Behalf Of Teemu Tuominen >>> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 8:53 PM >>> To: Development for the MeeGo Project >>> Subject: [MeeGo-dev] camera subdev solution ? >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I've been working with camera stack for Meego/N900. Recently the >>> gst-v4l2-camsrc was added to meego obs and I was a little confused >>> about >>> the naming and different affiliations of the project. >>> >>> However, I assume kind of generalization is about to happen with v4l2 >>> subdev& mediacontroller api's, but I would be delighted if someone >>> could sync me up to the work and roadmap of previously committed >>> projects. >>> >>> I have build modified gst-nokia-videosrc project in my obs home >>> (home:teemu.tuominen) for Meego/N900 to gain raw viewfinder mode >>> through >>> gst components (camerabin, subdevsrc). Is gst-v4l2-camsrc now the place >>> to add such patches ? >>> >>> regards, >>> Teemu Tuominen >>> Cybercom Plenware >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> MeeGo-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> MeeGo-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev > > _______________________________________________ > MeeGo-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev > _______________________________________________ > MeeGo-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
