> I'm not > sure that it's worth it - I suggest simply disabling the > testComplexUpdate test for Buteo+Google. There are also many other cases which can't be passed for some limitations. Does what you said mean real-world cases are more important?
Cheers, Yongsheng > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Patrick Ohly > Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 10:16 PM > To: Miao, Qiankun > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] strange behavior when sync Buteo > with Google contacts > > On Fr, 2010-11-12 at 13:57 +0000, Miao, Qiankun wrote: > > >Does it work with SyncEvolution? If yes, what is the > difference in > > the data exchange with the server? > > Yes, SyncEvolution works well. In SyncEvolution, after client > updated > > it's contact then synced with google server, client sent its > changes, > > no changes from google. But in Buteo, google also sent > updated items > > which is not a real change, google sent the same item as > client sent > > to it. > > You'll have to do a detailed comparison of the Add/Update > commands and > what the data looks like to determine the relevant difference. > I'm not > sure that it's worth it - I suggest simply disabling the > testComplexUpdate test for Buteo+Google. > > -- > Best Regards, Patrick Ohly > > The content of this message is my personal opinion only and > although > I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no > way > represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to > speak > on behalf of Intel on this matter. > > > _______________________________________________ > MeeGo-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
