On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 05:53 -0700, Wichmann, Mats D wrote:
> yes, you're right, it's just for "3rd party" (there's no really
> good term for this, "not part of the distribution" is another
> way that doesn't sound good).
>
> what sort of clarification did you have in mind?
In the empty space between chapter 3 and 3.1 you could add something
along these lines:
"This section specifies the compatibility requirements for
applications which are not part of the platform of a device
and can be considered additional software offered to the
end-users by any third party."
-- Antti
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
