On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 12:39 -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 2/4/2011 12:10 PM, Antti Kaijanmäki wrote:
> > IMO any component which does not support IPv6 fully must have bugs
> > opened against them with High priority.
>
> this would be a great idea for the 1.2 compliance spec to add imo.
> (but this doc is still the old 1.1 compliance)
Still I would like to see _some_ IPv6 requirement in 1.1
2.9 IPv6 Ready
A compliant system much support IPv6 or support means to enable
IPv6 some later time through standard system update procedures.
Actually there seems to be some certification program for IPv6[0], but
we probably should not go there for now. :)
[0] http://www.ipv6ready.org
-- Antti
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev