> From: Andrew Flegg [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 23 March, 2011 10:42
> [1] http://trac.tspre.org/meetbot/meego-meeting/2011/meego- > meeting.2011-03-18-14.58.html > [2] http://trac.tspre.org/meetbot/meego-meeting/2011/meego- > meeting.2011-03-18-14.58.log.html#l-116 > - from 15:32 onwards Thanks, it was a good read, probably I should have find it myself. But how does that change http://wiki.meego.com/Architecture ? TSG might miss a Nokia member, but architects and the process are still in place. > The > latent hostility coming through from some [email protected] addresses is > unbecoming. Hostility? No, mostly confusion and question marks. There were technical arguments. And I also care about MeeGo (OK, mostly for the handset/tablet part, but still :). But I assume hidden decisions about critical architecture issues quickly made in an interregnum would ring some bells for you too, in an inverse situation? Especially when questions and arguments are ignored after? Is that the way MeeGo is supposed to work? I don't think that would attract too many contributors. Even if I am stamped hostile against this, doesn't change it. Anyway, important is to have a working architecture and right solutions for the problems. I hope these can still be discussed. I stop here. Regards, Zoltan > > Cheers, > > Andrew > > [1] http://trac.tspre.org/meetbot/meego-meeting/2011/meego- > meeting.2011-03-18-14.58.html > [2] http://trac.tspre.org/meetbot/meego-meeting/2011/meego- > meeting.2011-03-18-14.58.log.html#l-116 > - from 15:32 onwards > [3] ...and presumably to give valhalla a seat again when he joins > Intel. > > -- > Andrew Flegg -- mailto:[email protected] | http://www.bleb.org/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev http://wiki.meego.com/Mailing_list_guidelines
