On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Sivan Greenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd also like to add that regardless of way the new architectural > decisions were made, he's communication of the decision was excellent
I think the existence (and breadth) of this thread is clear evidence that it wasn't. Or did you skip over the bits about people with expertise in the areas involved and Nokia architects noting that they hadn't been consulted about this at all, and their requests for information on what specific performance problems there were etc repeatedly being ignored? > Sometimes you need to use 'older' wheels and improve them until exhaustion > before recreating them... Yes. Key point being that you should try improve something *first* rather than throw it out on what seems to be a whim without consulting the people involved and without backing up your reasons for *why*. [I'd like to note that I am certainly not the world's biggest fan of some of the mentioned technologies, but I don't really support how this decision was made, either] > -Sivan -- Robin Burchell http://rburchell.com _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev http://wiki.meego.com/Mailing_list_guidelines
