On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Wichmann, Mats D
<[email protected]> wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
>
>> That document has a version number very similar to the MeeGo version
>> numbers. Does that mean they track each other? Or is that just a
>> coincidence? If they follow each other, are there relevant documents
>> for MeeGo 1.2? Does the spec change significantly from one version to
>> the other?
>
> it's not a coincidence, there should be a matching compliance spec
> for each meego.com release.

Okay, that clears things up for me.

> changes will be very small once things settle, however the likelihood
> of changes at this stage is still fairly high - much more on the
> application viewpoint than the system viewpoint.

That makes sense especially in light of recent events the last six months or so.

> there's no public draft of 1.2 compliance yet; think of 1.1 with the
> exceptions removed (there's one indicting the ARM abi will change,
> another that the GL->GLES change is happening); and that there will
> be a different package list, determined by the patterns described
> at http://wiki.meego.com/Quality/Compliance_Implementation

So compliance gets defined, then one might say it gets "validated" by
being made concrete in the package "patterns?" This seems to present a
logical process that one can follow.

> (Incidentally 1.1 is complete/approved, the fact that the wiki
> still only has drafts is due to a strange config problem that wasn't
> allowing pdfs to update, I need to check if that's resolved now
> and update if it is)

Good to know.

> (we shouuld probably trim the number of lists this goes to;

Trimmed MeeGo-Architecture from CC list, trimmed individuals from the
CC list. I'd like to keep this on IVI as well since I think we're
going to begin to focus a bit more on our IVI profile and I hope that
this discussion can be part of that work.

> meego-dev is considered the home for compliance discussion,
> but it's okay to keep it on the IVI list if you prefer, I'm
> signed up there now)


Great. :-)

Thanks very much for your participation Mats, very useful.

Regards,

Jeremiah
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
http://wiki.meego.com/Mailing_list_guidelines

Reply via email to