Hi,

I've noticed we're getting more and more packages that has closed
source licenses on the packaging itself. This is problematic as
technically, we don't have rights to build those packages within MeeGo
and probably even publish the source rpms on repo.meego.com and others
to mirror our repos.

I don't know what the policy should be - frankly, I'd either prefer
'no license' like most of our spec files, or a general statement that
our packaging (not content) is open source.

Could distribution engineers/architects elaborate on this topic and
set forth a policy?

BR
Carsten Munk
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-packaging mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging

Reply via email to