Dnia 2010-11-22, pon o godzinie 08:42 +0100, Carsten Munk pisze: > Could distribution engineers/architects elaborate on this topic and > set forth a policy?
openSUSE .spec files say: > # All modifications and additions to the file contributed by third parties > # remain the property of their copyright owners, unless otherwise agreed > # upon. The license for this file, and modifications and additions to the > # file, is the same license as for the pristine package itself (unless the > # license for the pristine package is not an Open Source License, in which > # case the license is the MIT License). An "Open Source License" is a > # license that conforms to the Open Source Definition (Version 1.9) > # published by the Open Source Initiative. Which IMO is a good compromise, using another policy could pose problems with collaboration between MeeGo and other packaging sources. -- Michał Sawicz <[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ MeeGo-packaging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging
