yes, those licenses should not be there and should be rejected. Anas
On 2010-11-22, at 7:42 AM, Carsten Munk wrote: > Hi, > > I've noticed we're getting more and more packages that has closed > source licenses on the packaging itself. This is problematic as > technically, we don't have rights to build those packages within MeeGo > and probably even publish the source rpms on repo.meego.com and others > to mirror our repos. > > I don't know what the policy should be - frankly, I'd either prefer > 'no license' like most of our spec files, or a general statement that > our packaging (not content) is open source. > > Could distribution engineers/architects elaborate on this topic and > set forth a policy? > > BR > Carsten Munk > _______________________________________________ > MeeGo-packaging mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging _______________________________________________ MeeGo-packaging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging
