Hi,

(Not part of security team)

Will a patch to solve the current Trunk ARM build failure for libsmack
be accepted?

rpm as a base package depends on libsmack, so it's quite critical in
the bootstrap of the armv8el/hardfp port that we get these compiled
into proper OBS fashion.

BR
Carsten Munk

2011/3/11 Tracy Graydon <[email protected]>:
> Hi Shaik Parvez,
> The following change has been rejected.
>
> Reason:
>    We are not accepting security changes to T:T right now while the security 
> architecture is still under discussion.
>
> Please fix the issues above and resubmit.
>
> Thanks,
> MeeGo Release Engineering Team
>
> [This message was auto-generated]
> ---
>
> Request #14678:
>
>  submit:   devel:security/libsmack(r5)(update) -> Trunk:Testing/libsmack
>
>
> Message:
>    # - Remove crappy getline() reading and replace with fgets reading in 
> smack_rule_set_new()
> # - Implemented smack_have_access() function.
> # - Fix: update mtime for global_rules.
> # - BID#13247
> # - Needed for FEA#9093
>
> State:   declined     2011-03-11T13:10:50 tracyg
> Comment: We are not accepting security changes to T:T right now while the 
> security architecture is still under discussion.
>
>
> History: new          2011-03-10T10:14:57 sparvez
>
> _______________________________________________
> MeeGo-commits mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-commits
>
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-packaging mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging

Reply via email to