2011/3/14 Ryan Ware <[email protected]>: > Carsten, > > The dependency of RPM on libsmack has been backed out of T:T. While we > re-evaluate the MeeGo Security Requirements, we will not be introducing > any additional MSSF features into T:T. If any of the MSSF packages or > patches show aberrant behavior, we'll remove that package or patch for the > time being. > > If you have any concerns around this, please let me know.
No concerns, it might actually make the bootstrap build cycle shorter and at the same time it fixed my problem. /Carsten > > Ryan > > On 3/11/11 2:49 PM, "Tracy Graydon" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>Hi Carsten, >> >>I'll defer to Ryan on this. I declined these SRs based on his input this >>morning. He indicated that there are ongoing discussions regarding >>architecture. Given the issues we've seen with the libsmack stuff, I am >>accepting/declining based on Ryan's guidance. >> >>I am sure that if you and Ryan are in agreement on specific changes, there >>would be no issue with acceptance. Ryan will give me the nod when it is >>good >>to go for T:T acceptance. So, I'd recommend pinging him, and resubmitting >>accordingly. With his nod, I can happily accept the changes. >> >>Ryan, if I missed something, please let me know. I am always on the >>look-out >>for i586 build issues, but we don't look at ARM at that closely, since >>most >>ARM-related stuff isn't in our (my) bailiwick. It is possible I overlooked >>something. >> >>Tracy >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [email protected] >>[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Carsten Munk >>Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 1:19 PM >>To: [email protected] >>Subject: Re: [meego-packaging] [meego-commits] 14678 declined: >>devel:security/libsmack to Trunk:Testing/libsmack >> >>Hi, >> >>(Not part of security team) >> >>Will a patch to solve the current Trunk ARM build failure for libsmack >>be accepted? >> >>rpm as a base package depends on libsmack, so it's quite critical in >>the bootstrap of the armv8el/hardfp port that we get these compiled >>into proper OBS fashion. >> >>BR >>Carsten Munk >> >>2011/3/11 Tracy Graydon <[email protected]>: >>> Hi Shaik Parvez, >>> The following change has been rejected. >>> >>> Reason: >>> We are not accepting security changes to T:T right now while the >>security architecture is still under discussion. >>> >>> Please fix the issues above and resubmit. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> MeeGo Release Engineering Team >>> >>> [This message was auto-generated] >>> --- >>> >>> Request #14678: >>> >>> submit: devel:security/libsmack(r5)(update) -> Trunk:Testing/libsmack >>> >>> >>> Message: >>> # - Remove crappy getline() reading and replace with fgets reading in >>smack_rule_set_new() >>> # - Implemented smack_have_access() function. >>> # - Fix: update mtime for global_rules. >>> # - BID#13247 >>> # - Needed for FEA#9093 >>> >>> State: declined 2011-03-11T13:10:50 tracyg >>> Comment: We are not accepting security changes to T:T right now while >>>the >>security architecture is still under discussion. >>> >>> >>> History: new 2011-03-10T10:14:57 sparvez >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> MeeGo-commits mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-commits >>> >>_______________________________________________ >>MeeGo-packaging mailing list >>[email protected] >>http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging >> >>_______________________________________________ >>MeeGo-packaging mailing list >>[email protected] >>http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging > > > _______________________________________________ > MeeGo-packaging mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging > _______________________________________________ MeeGo-packaging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging
