Hi Carsten, I'll defer to Ryan on this. I declined these SRs based on his input this morning. He indicated that there are ongoing discussions regarding architecture. Given the issues we've seen with the libsmack stuff, I am accepting/declining based on Ryan's guidance.
I am sure that if you and Ryan are in agreement on specific changes, there would be no issue with acceptance. Ryan will give me the nod when it is good to go for T:T acceptance. So, I'd recommend pinging him, and resubmitting accordingly. With his nod, I can happily accept the changes. Ryan, if I missed something, please let me know. I am always on the look-out for i586 build issues, but we don't look at ARM at that closely, since most ARM-related stuff isn't in our (my) bailiwick. It is possible I overlooked something. Tracy -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Carsten Munk Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 1:19 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [meego-packaging] [meego-commits] 14678 declined: devel:security/libsmack to Trunk:Testing/libsmack Hi, (Not part of security team) Will a patch to solve the current Trunk ARM build failure for libsmack be accepted? rpm as a base package depends on libsmack, so it's quite critical in the bootstrap of the armv8el/hardfp port that we get these compiled into proper OBS fashion. BR Carsten Munk 2011/3/11 Tracy Graydon <[email protected]>: > Hi Shaik Parvez, > The following change has been rejected. > > Reason: > We are not accepting security changes to T:T right now while the security architecture is still under discussion. > > Please fix the issues above and resubmit. > > Thanks, > MeeGo Release Engineering Team > > [This message was auto-generated] > --- > > Request #14678: > > submit: devel:security/libsmack(r5)(update) -> Trunk:Testing/libsmack > > > Message: > # - Remove crappy getline() reading and replace with fgets reading in smack_rule_set_new() > # - Implemented smack_have_access() function. > # - Fix: update mtime for global_rules. > # - BID#13247 > # - Needed for FEA#9093 > > State: declined 2011-03-11T13:10:50 tracyg > Comment: We are not accepting security changes to T:T right now while the security architecture is still under discussion. > > > History: new 2011-03-10T10:14:57 sparvez > > _______________________________________________ > MeeGo-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-commits > _______________________________________________ MeeGo-packaging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging _______________________________________________ MeeGo-packaging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-packaging
