Hi Elva, On 6/15/11 10:06 AM, "ext Fu, Elva" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Since this involves bug management process on bug fix and verification. >>I >> would like Steve could share some basic ideas on this feature >>especially for >> following items: >> >> There are a couple of platforms that MeeGo needs to support, how we >> record the fix on each platforms in backend? >> This involves which technical choice is used for recording this >>information in >> DB backend, create a separated custom field for each platform or use >> multiple selection field as suggested by Iekku or any other solutions? >> >> In addition, the HW verification field can only hold verification >>information, >> how we handle the fix integration etc information in each platform. And >>how >> we say a bug is fixed is really fixed especially for bug could be >>reproduced on >> several platforms but target date to fix is different for each platform? >> >> If we support multiple HW verification, then we may need to change the >> platform field to multiple selectable. So users will be able to >>identify which >> platforms the bug could be reproduced. Here is the feature request for >>this: >> https://bugs.meego.com/show_bug.cgi?id=18473 >> >> Thanks >> Shuang >> > >Hello all, >Personally I think we should discuss about this new feature and get some >agreements before implementing it. :-) As per my previous comment on Shuang's email, having both discussion on this ML and staging area is all we need :) >basically I agree with Shuang that "multiple platform support" should not >be limited to bug verification. So the upstream patch should better cover the cases we need... > >Thanks >Elva BR, Eric >_______________________________________________ >MeeGo-qa mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-qa _______________________________________________ MeeGo-qa mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-qa
