Hello Eric,
Thanks for clarifying. :-)

Thanks,
Elva

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 4:58 PM
> To: Fu, Elva; Wan, Shuang; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Meego-qa] "HW Verification" field usage
> 
> Hi Elva,
> 
> On 6/15/11 10:06 AM, "ext Fu, Elva" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> >> Since this involves bug management process on bug fix and verification.
> >>I
> >> would like Steve could share some basic ideas on this feature
> >>especially for
> >> following items:
> >>
> >> There are a couple of platforms that MeeGo needs to support, how we
> >> record the fix on each platforms in backend?
> >> This involves which technical choice is used for recording this
> >>information in
> >> DB backend, create a separated custom field for each platform or use
> >> multiple selection field as suggested by Iekku or any other solutions?
> >>
> >> In addition, the HW verification field can only hold verification
> >>information,
> >> how we handle the fix integration etc information in each platform. And
> >>how
> >> we say a bug is fixed is really fixed especially for bug could be
> >>reproduced on
> >> several platforms but target date to fix is different for each platform?
> >>
> >> If we support multiple HW verification, then we may need to change the
> >> platform field to multiple selectable. So users will be able to
> >>identify which
> >> platforms the bug could be reproduced. Here is the feature request for
> >>this:
> >> https://bugs.meego.com/show_bug.cgi?id=18473
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Shuang
> >>
> >
> >Hello all,
> >Personally I think we should discuss about this new feature and get some
> >agreements before implementing it. :-)
> 
> As per my previous comment on Shuang's email, having both discussion on
> this ML and staging area is all we need :)
> 
> >basically I agree with Shuang that "multiple platform support" should not
> >be limited to bug verification.
> 
> So the upstream patch should better cover the cases we need...
> 
> >
> >Thanks
> >Elva
> 
> BR,
> Eric
> 
> >_______________________________________________
> >MeeGo-qa mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-qa

_______________________________________________
MeeGo-qa mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-qa

Reply via email to