> [1] This is the reason I fall into the "mailing list automatically setting reply-to header is bad" camp.
Yeah, I think I kind of agree actually. -- Noon On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Brian May <[email protected]> wrote: > Apologies for the last post - assuming it got through, it was suppose to > be a private reply, but I failed to notice in time that this mailing list > sets the reply-to header, and as such the private reply was redirected back > to the list[1]. > > I don't think there was anything actually private in my email, however > apologies for breaking mailing list etiquette. > > [1] This is the reason I fall into the "mailing list automatically setting > reply-to header is bad" camp. > > _______________________________________________ > melbourne-pug mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug > > -- Noon Silk, ن https://sites.google.com/site/noonsilk/ "Every morning when I wake up, I experience an exquisite joy — the joy of being this signature."
_______________________________________________ melbourne-pug mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug
