Six of one, half a dozen of the other. I've never found a 'best' setting, you just have to choose your preferred set of hassles.
I'll change it if 70% of people agree and at least ten people express an opinion. That's because I value stability at 25% but I can't have half a person if only ten people vote :). Cheers, -T On 25 May 2015 at 16:06, Noon Silk <[email protected]> wrote: > > [1] This is the reason I fall into the "mailing list automatically > setting reply-to header is bad" camp. > > Yeah, I think I kind of agree actually. > > -- > Noon > > > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Brian May < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Apologies for the last post - assuming it got through, it was suppose to >> be a private reply, but I failed to notice in time that this mailing list >> sets the reply-to header, and as such the private reply was redirected back >> to the list[1]. >> >> I don't think there was anything actually private in my email, however >> apologies for breaking mailing list etiquette. >> >> [1] This is the reason I fall into the "mailing list automatically >> setting reply-to header is bad" camp. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> melbourne-pug mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug >> >> > > > -- > Noon Silk, ن > > https://sites.google.com/site/noonsilk/ > > "Every morning when I wake up, I experience an exquisite joy — the joy > of being this signature." > > _______________________________________________ > melbourne-pug mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug > > -- -------------------------------------------------- Tennessee Leeuwenburg http://myownhat.blogspot.com/ "Don't believe everything you think"
_______________________________________________ melbourne-pug mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pug
