Title: RE: V-6 or 4cyl?

Aren't the V8's reasonalby balanced? ie. better than V6 and inline 4.

    -----Original Message-----
    From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
    Sent:   13/11/2001 13:15
    To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    Subject:        Re: V-6 or 4cyl?

    The theory behind engine configuration is about balance and packaging

    A 'V' engine (except v12) is fundamentally unbalanced. i.e they shake and vibrate because all the rotating and reciprocating components are not fully balanced.

    V engines are compact, this is their advantage.

    An in-line four cylinder also unbalanced - but you can add two balance shafts to compensate

    straight 6 engines are fully balanced for most harmonics, that is why BMW still use them when a v-6 would be lighter, cheaper, and more compact.

    Flat 'boxer' engines are fundamentally balanced and use a very short, and therefore stiff, crankshaft.
    This is why Subaru and alfa-sud engines are so smooth and responsive compared with inline fours.

    Straight 8's are fully balanced but the crankshaft is long and not torsionally stiff and you'd need a long engine bay to fit it all in

    PS just because some engines are smoother than others it doesn't mean that they can't go just hard

    Nick
    >
    > > so can you explain why?
    > >
    > > Drag cars are v-8's because noone makes straight 8's...
    > >
    > > If your theory is true why aren't all motors Vees?
    > > What about the boxers?
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: James Marmont [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
    > > Sent: Tuesday, 13 November 2001 12:08
    > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
    > > Subject: RE: V-6 or 4cyl?
    > >
    > >
    > > no way!!!!!! Thats why all top fuel drags are "V"s
    > >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
    > > Sent: Tuesday, 13 November 2001 12:42 PM
    > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    > > Subject: RE: V-6 or 4cyl?
    > >
    > >
    > > that's just for space reasons I thought...
    > >
    > >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: James Marmont [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
    > > Sent: Tuesday, 13 November 2001 11:20
    > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
    > > Subject: RE: V-6 or 4cyl?
    > >
    > >
    > > the "v" says it all
    > >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
    > > Sent: Tuesday, 13 November 2001 11:32 AM
    > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    > > Subject: V-6 or 4cyl?
    > >
    > >
    > > Hey All,
    > >
    > > Does anyone know whether it is the number of cylinders or the capacity of an
    > > engine that determines it's torque?
    > >
    > > That is would a 2l V6 have more torque that a 2l 4 cyl??
    > >
    > > Iggy (dreaming again) Sandejas
    > > Sydney NSW
    > > Datsun 1600 FJ20t


--membersozdat-------------------------------------------------------
OZDAT Mailing List Please Note:-
Send (un)subscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No unauthorised redistribution of this email
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to