Mick,

The heat shield has caused quite a dramatic change by the looks of it and I
guess if your design is that effective then that's to be expected with the
fine tuning req'd to get the best out of that type of engine. I used heat
shields in the rally car usually only at sea level and with fairly similar
effect. What we changed from running in altitude as opposed to sea level was
to run with the heat shield, used 2mm bigger chokes and .10mm bigger main
jets and run +2/3 degrees static advance, usually higher at night. We mainly
used a 66 degree cam in Canberra and a 72 degree cam at sea level and the
Artie Jackson engine produced very similar hp. We had the most dramatic
change if we run the Canberra setup at Bega (sea level) and not so evident
the other way around.

Now you're using a bigger cam again (one that we didn't particularly like on
dirt) as it was too peaky but I'm thinking that it could be far more
sensitive to air density than either of the smaller cams as it's at it's
peak velocity for a short period of time (very much dirt racer thinking and
not so critical for a circuit car.) I wouldn't change too much at once,
perhaps if you can get hold of a set of 38mm chokes to try out, fit 160 main
jets and up the static timing a tad (watch pinging of course but a 76 cam
shouldn't ping at all under 11:1 CR on 98 octane) and see what happens from
there.

good luck on the weekend,

regards
Terry

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of mick ralph
Sent: Tuesday, 29 January 2002 7:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: weber heat shield Part 2


Today I made up and fitted the heat shield and took the car for a run up the
motorway for a couple of hours. Some very interesting first impressions...
1. The carbs are cool to the touch after an hour on the freeway....normally
quite hot
2. Fitting the brackets to the underneath exhaust studs is a real pain!!!!!
3. The motor seemed really dead ie down on power  I got blown off by a
porker 924!!!
4  Fuel consumption was noticeably way down. I reckon a 1/3 less than
normal!
Questions
If the carbs were running significantly cooler, could this upset the
jetting? What sort of change might u expect ie richer or leaner? Would it
affect low rev range or high rev range?
Might it run leaner is the question I guess?
Relevent settings
twin 45dcoe
Venturi  36
Main Jet 150
Air correction jet 150
Emulsion Tube F2
Idle Jet 45 F9
Pump Jet 40
Plugs BP6EY
Std B/B electronic dissy - no vac advance
15 BTDC
76 degree cam
Big valves etc etc
Cheers
Mick



--membersozdat-------------------------------------------------------
OZDAT Mailing List   Please Note:-
Send (un)subscribe requests to  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send  submissions to  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No unauthorised redistribution of this email
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to