the only thing i had against the 240k box was the car came slightly off cam from 2nd to 3rd gear change. 1st to 2nd, made the car quick to 100, but slowed slighly waiting for power from 3rd. 3rd to 4th to 5th was good though.
my 2 cents Heath > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mark Firman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Membersozdat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 3:05 PM > Subject: 240k box > > > > hi all, > > > > i was just wondering on the strength of a 240k five speed box. i have a CA > > turbo i am thinking about putting in my bodgy old 1600 but don't have a > > starter motor, flywheel clutch or gearbox. i do have a CA 20 bluebird five > > speed, but heard they are crap. i also have a 240k box which is in good > > nick. would the bellhousing off the ca20 box fit up to the k box and make > > for a stronger setup? (similar to stumpy skyline/ca20 mix) how much power > > would it handle. next, would a flywheel, starter motor and a stronger > clutch > > from a ca20 work? or should i just get a stumpy skyline box and fit that > to > > the ca bellhousing. would either of these combos have a tailshaft off any > > car the would fit? > > > > cheers > > > > Leigh via mark's email > > > > > > --membersozdat------------------------------------------------------- OZDAT Mailing List Please Note:- Send (un)subscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] No unauthorised redistribution of this email http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------
