I have a pair of 240K arms, I'm in Perth.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 9:16 PM
Subject: Re: 240k a arm bearing size

I think i'll have to find some 240k trailing arms and see if they are going to suit my requirements.Ive found out that although the r31 stub axles are stronger than the 1600 stubs they are probably still not up to the task so i might end up getting some billet en26 stubs made if the price isnt to bad.
----- Original Message -----
From: Rob P
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: 240k a arm bearing size

Andrew,
Here are 2 nuggets of info from my own email archive, for both I must give credit to that ever-wise fountain of knowledge,Richard Clough. I haven't tried it myself but have heard of people moving the mounting points 20mm inwards each side of the rear 1600 crossmember in order to keep the track standard. -Rob
 
"I can confirm that the 240K rear trailing arms bolt onto the 1600 crossmember.  They give you about 40mm wider track from memory.  Only other problem I can see is the shock absorbers are "reverse engineered" - the mushroom rubbers are at the bottom and the horizontal bolt on the top.... I haven't measured both arms with the same wheels on. However, a set of 14" Globe "Bathurst" pattern wheels off a 240k fitted nicely onto my 1600.  I assume they are pretty close to the same outer edge profile."
R Clough
 
 
Richard Clough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 > Both the 240K and MR30 Skyline trailing arms will
> > bolt on to 180B and 1600
> > rear crossmembers.
> > The shocker mounts are different on the 240K arms
> > (basically they bolt up
> > like a 1600 shocker mounted upside down) and
> > shockers fitted in their
> > standard position will foul any disc brakes you may
> > try to fit.
>
>  The MR30
> > Skyline Coupe arms have disc fitted but have
> > coilover shockers, not the
> > coil-in- trailing arm like the previous models.  If
> > you want to try the 240K
> > arms then you do get slightly larger rear drums and
> > bigger wheel bearings.
> > I have just dismantled some 240K trailing arms today
> > and there are a few
> > parts common to a 1600. Richard Clough
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: 240k a arm bearing size

hey mate,  not sure what type of 240k it was from, but thats what we used for simons rear end. 240k arms and i think dr30 bearings and dr30 stubs and flanges. widens the track a fair bit though. and you need to put 1600 shock mounts on the 240k arms, and get springs that are a fair bit shorter.

andrew 
 
--- "Andrew Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 
From: "Andrew Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:28:25 +0800
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: 240k a arm bearing size

Can anyone tell my if the bearings for the stub axle that goes in the trailing arm of an early 240k are the same size as the 1600 bearings or are they a big and a small.Basically i'm look to fit the larger jap r31 stubs into 1600 trailing arms but it might be easier to use 240k arms if they have a big and a small bearing like the r31. 

--membersozdat-------------------------------------------------------
OZDAT Mailing List Please Note:-
Send (un)subscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send submissions to [email protected]
No unauthorised redistribution of this email
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
---------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Get Your free Ozdat Email Account
---> http://www.ozdat.com

--membersozdat-------------------------------------------------------
OZDAT Mailing List Please Note:-
Send (un)subscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send submissions to [email protected]
No unauthorised redistribution of this email
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
---------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.9.2/53 - Release Date: 20/07/2005

--membersozdat-------------------------------------------------------
OZDAT Mailing List Please Note:-
Send (un)subscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send submissions to [email protected]
No unauthorised redistribution of this email
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
---------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.9.1/51 - Release Date: 18/07/2005

--membersozdat-------------------------------------------------------
OZDAT Mailing List Please Note:-
Send (un)subscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send submissions to [email protected]
No unauthorised redistribution of this email
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
---------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.9.2/55 - Release Date: 21/07/2005

--membersozdat-------------------------------------------------------
OZDAT Mailing List Please Note:-
Send (un)subscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send submissions to [email protected]
No unauthorised redistribution of this email
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/index.htm
http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/listindex.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.9.4/57 - Release Date: 22/07/2005

Reply via email to