One is a permenant, on disk storage that is local to the process using it. The other is a networked, in memory cache that is lossy. There really is no comparison whatsoever.

Brian.
--------
http://brian.moonspot.net/

On 4/19/10 1:25 PM, david352 wrote:
Has anyone every compared memcached with SQLite in terms of execution
speed and code size? Yes, I know SQLite has much more functionality.




--
Subscription settings: http://groups.google.com/group/memcached/subscribe?hl=en

Reply via email to