On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Eric Bergen <[email protected]> wrote: > Just because they can both do the same basic functionality > (store/retrieve a value) doesn't make them a substitute for each other > or worth comparing.
In addition, I would point out that SQLite is significantly slower than other on-disk storage, like BerkelyDB. It also performs terribly with multiple writers. It just isn't that fast compared to the alternatives. - Perrin -- Subscription settings: http://groups.google.com/group/memcached/subscribe?hl=en
