On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Dustin <[email protected]> wrote:
>  This is quite off-topic, but that's not true unless you configure
> one worse than the other and find filesystems and IO systems that
> don't work as well.  For example:
>
>  http://skitch.com/dlsspy/nh2qb/kvtest-results-on-linode

My tests were a few years ago, and SQLite may be faster than it used
to be, but I tried pretty hard to tune it and had help from experts.
It never came close to BerkeleyDB's BTree with a decent cache size
setting.  BerkeleyDB also beat memcached with the old pure-perl client
module, presumably due to not needing to do any IPC.  This may not be
true anymore with the newer libmemcached-based client.

- Perrin


-- 
Subscription settings: http://groups.google.com/group/memcached/subscribe?hl=en

Reply via email to