On May 31, 2008, at 7:41, Henrik Schröder wrote:
No I haven't, for a bunch of reasons. First is that the current feature-set is good enough for our own needs,
That's sort of why I responded. I read ``feature-complete'' as ``supporting all features.''
In particular, CAS isn't fully complete in 1.2.5 and will probably not be backported to the text protocol due to the protocol disruption it'd likely introduce (we do CAS on append, prepend, set, add, update, and delete at least as well as returning CAS values from all commands).
and second is that we're using the windows port of the server, and I think we'll see the binary protocol in that version very late, if at all.
There seem to be very few people with Windows server interest. Do you have any time to put into helping memcached continue working on the Windows platform?
-- Dustin Sallings
