Is that the 64 bit or 32 bit version? Thanks
"If you see a whole thing - it seems that it's always beautiful. Planets, lives... But up close a world's all dirt and rocks. And day to day, life's a hard job, you get tired, you lose the pattern." Ursula K. Le Guin On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 7:55 AM, Henrik Schröder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I put up an archive at > http://code.google.com/p/beitmemcached/downloads/list, grab it from there > and test it out. Would love to get more people testing it so we know if the > weird CPU usage is gone for good. > > > /Henrik Schröder > > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Stephen Johnston < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I would be very much interested in a Windows Binary that didn't eat up one >> of our cores. >> >> -Stephen >> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:34 AM, Henrik Schröder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Henrik Schröder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Jeff Rodenburg < >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Henrik - can you elaborate on what you've found with this? I'm not >>>>> looking to resolve the issues, just trying to get a better picture of >>>>> where >>>>> the bodies are buried, and to convince an all-windows shop that it's OK to >>>>> run a few linux instances to support certain application services. >>>>> >>>> >>>> On our current project, we run memcached on two servers that are also >>>> web servers, and on both machines the memcached process consumes exactly >>>> 25% >>>> CPU. The weird thing is that those two servers have different hardware. One >>>> is a two-processor dual core Xeon at 2,5GHz, and the other is a >>>> two-processor dual core Xeon at 1,6GHz. The first one runs Windows Server >>>> 2008, the other Windows Server 2003. But the memcached process on each >>>> takes >>>> up exactly 25% CPU all the time. I can also see on the stats that the >>>> second >>>> server gets more memcached traffic than the first one, so the second server >>>> is slower than the first and gets more traffic, but the CPU use is 25% on >>>> both servers. >>>> >>> >>> Ok, thanks to Brodie Thiesfield who managed to produce working Visual >>> Studio projects of Libevent 1.4.4 and Memcached 1.2.5, I've compiled my own >>> version. I took his project, added the old memcached icon (These things are >>> important! :) ), fixed a file version number, and compiled everything in my >>> Visual Studio 2005 with whatever optimizations it can do, and finally got to >>> deploy this version live. >>> >>> It's been running for a day now, and so far it looks good, still at 0% >>> CPU utilization so hopefully whatever problems the older windows versions of >>> memcached had are gone. I'll let it run for a week, and if it's still >>> behaving after that time, I'll try to make available our binary for those >>> that are interested. >>> >>> >>> /Henrik Schröder >>> >> > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "memcached" group. > To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/memcached?hl=en > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- > >
