The problem we've seen is that memcached eats a complete core out of our four cores. The transactional (get, set, etc.) performance seems fine, but losing one out of 4 cores is a bit rough.
-Stephen On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Jeff Rodenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > we're pretty concerned about the bad performance of the Windows port of >> the memcached server, > > > Henrik - can you elaborate on what you've found with this? I'm not looking > to resolve the issues, just trying to get a better picture of where the > bodies are buried, and to convince an all-windows shop that it's OK to run a > few linux instances to support certain application services. > -- Stephen Johnston President/CEO Guild Launch, LLC http://www.guildlaunch.com/ Communities for online gamers, guilds and clans.
